This is supposed to counter reviewer prejudice against the author (sex, race, affiliation), making for a more honest review process. Here the reviewers don’t know the identity of the authors and vice versa. One alternative to open peer review is double-blind peer review. And reviews of fundamental points, which means it can take a good deal of time to revise the article. Sometimes you get really superficial reviews, but sometimes they’re detailed, right down to the finest detail. The reviews of your paper on PeerJ were detailed is this the norm or were these the exception? I’m even planning to work with one of my reviewers on a follow-up paper. I’ve also been lucky enough to have really good constructive reviews. I like to be able to work like this with reviewers. It’s not compulsory but PeerJ does encourage it. I see no reason not to have everything published online. Both author and reviewers must opt for the peer-review process to be published online. As an author you can choose to have everything published online. Not only do they do that, but they also let you publish all reviews and replies to reviews online, so that everyone really can see every step of the peer-review process.Īs a reviewer you can choose whether you want your name published or not. There are also journals that only let you review for them if you sign the review. PeerJ is the first journal that I’ve published in to make the peer-review process open to the extent that it does. I always sign my reviews that’s my own choice. Here the reviewers know who the author is, but the author doesn’t know who the reviewers are. ![]() The most common form is the classic form of peer review: single-blind peer review. What is the most common form of peer review in the social sciences? We asked him some questions about peer review. Casper Albers , Associate Professor of Statistics at the Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, published an article in PeerJ and chose to make the accompanying review history public. ![]() PeerJ is a journal that offers this possibility. Some journals also publish reviews together with the final accepted article, so readers see both the identity of the reviewers and their comments. ![]() ![]() Here everyone knows the identity of the author and the reviewers. This reflects a growing trend towards more transparent scholarship. A particular type of peer review is emerging: open peer review. Peer review plays an important role in academic publishing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |